PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.18%
Negative net income growth while META stands at 8.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
8.64%
D&A growth well above META's 7.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-853.46%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
11.42%
Less SBC growth vs. META's 29.59%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-113.97%
Both reduce yoy usage, with META at -432.29%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-196.53%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with META at -146.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
173.49%
AP growth well above META's 122.48%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-7.64%
Negative yoy usage while META is 115.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
73.46%
Well above META's 41.53%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-7.65%
Negative yoy CFO while META is 0.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-9.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with META at -27.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
57.38%
Acquisition spending well above META's 20.83%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-6.53%
Negative yoy purchasing while META stands at 52.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
33.94%
We have some liquidation growth while META is negative at -30.10%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-231.68%
We reduce yoy other investing while META is 83.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
67.53%
Investing outflow well above META's 4.99%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
57.16%
Debt repayment above 1.5x META's 5.08%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.08%
Buyback growth below 50% of META's 58.03%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.