PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
411.29%
Some net income increase while PINS is negative at -1648.44%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.97%
Negative yoy D&A while PINS is 22.18%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-212.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
33.03%
SBC growth while PINS is negative at -27.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-88.58%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PINS is 297.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
155.76%
AR growth well above PINS's 187.69%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-167.71%
Negative yoy inventory while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-81.87%
Negative yoy AP while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-90.13%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PINS at -72.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-4612.50%
Both negative yoy, with PINS at -62.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
13.38%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PINS's 207.52%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-69.47%
Negative yoy CapEx while PINS is 52.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-8828.57%
Negative yoy acquisition while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
36.10%
Purchases growth of 36.10% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-15.74%
We reduce yoy sales while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
66.67%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. PINS's 872.81%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-12.50%
We reduce yoy invests while PINS stands at 1264.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-109.16%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.43%
We cut yoy buybacks while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.