PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.75%
Some net income increase while PINS is negative at -110.43%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-26.09%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with PINS at -13.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-34.13%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
16.20%
SBC growth while PINS is negative at -7.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-172.44%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PINS is 189.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
151.31%
AR growth well above PINS's 177.61%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-175.75%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with PINS at -50779.26%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-201.97%
Both negative yoy AP, with PINS at -108.93%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-2.64%
Negative yoy usage while PINS is 22241.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-74.43%
Negative yoy while PINS is 490.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-14.94%
Negative yoy CFO while PINS is 168.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-8.45%
Negative yoy CapEx while PINS is 62.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-350.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-0.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while PINS stands at 35.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
10.36%
We have some liquidation growth while PINS is negative at -26.61%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
152.63%
Growth well above PINS's 29.48%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
26.07%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. PINS's 64.55%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-1543.86%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.