PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.38%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PINS at -103.02%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
9.97%
D&A growth well above PINS's 0.26%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-229.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
13.91%
SBC growth while PINS is negative at -47.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
140.31%
Well above PINS's 200.58% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
175.00%
AR growth well above PINS's 220.22%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-305.10%
Negative yoy AP while PINS is 88.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
63.55%
Some yoy usage while PINS is negative at -171.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
163.28%
Some yoy increase while PINS is negative at -88.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
0.69%
Operating cash flow growth similar to PINS's 0.76%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-53.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -86.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
55.06%
Acquisition spending well above PINS's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
28.44%
Purchases well above PINS's 31.22%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-18.41%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PINS at -10.60%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
255.00%
Growth well above PINS's 252.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
17.84%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. PINS's 266.57%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-157.97%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.28%
Buyback growth of 1.28% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.