PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.64%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PINS at -715.68%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.09%
Less D&A growth vs. PINS's 26.52%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-2.73%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
6.17%
Less SBC growth vs. PINS's 60.31%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-570.12%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PINS at -79.96%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-145.12%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PINS at -120.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
150.61%
Lower AP growth vs. PINS's 1074.45%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-215.27%
Negative yoy usage while PINS is 145.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-30.06%
Negative yoy while PINS is 218.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-22.64%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PINS at -43.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
30.23%
Some CapEx rise while PINS is negative at -88.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-514.45%
Negative yoy acquisition while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
23.99%
Some yoy expansion while PINS is negative at -37.02%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-13.71%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PINS at -11.83%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-37.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -146.46%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
53.74%
We have mild expansions while PINS is negative at -353.49%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
19.84%
Debt repayment growth of 19.84% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.