PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.04%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 83.25%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
6.62%
Some D&A expansion while PINS is negative at -18.37%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-30.26%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.27%
SBC growth well above PINS's 18.52%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
113.84%
Slight usage while PINS is negative at -159.69%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-166.19%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PINS at -128.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
201.27%
A yoy AP increase while PINS is negative at -20.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
334.56%
Growth well above PINS's 94.87%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
29.21%
Some yoy increase while PINS is negative at -88.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
21.94%
Some CFO growth while PINS is negative at -65.81%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-9.52%
Negative yoy CapEx while PINS is 59.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-609.52%
Negative yoy acquisition while PINS stands at 297.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-49.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while PINS stands at 2.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
2.74%
We have some liquidation growth while PINS is negative at -16.35%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-85.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -297.05%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-266.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -330.45%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
81.95%
Debt repayment growth of 81.95% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -211.97%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.