PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
7.19%
Net income growth under 50% of PINS's 119.27%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
11.86%
Some D&A expansion while PINS is negative at -3.33%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
24.47%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. PINS's 192.25%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-0.54%
Negative yoy SBC while PINS is 1.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-27.90%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PINS is 1.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
4.31%
AR growth while PINS is negative at -39.19%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
1543.08%
Inventory growth of 1543.08% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-80.07%
Negative yoy AP while PINS is 157.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-44.36%
Negative yoy usage while PINS is 24.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
86.63%
Some yoy increase while PINS is negative at -167.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
6.94%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PINS's 73.00%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-16.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -20.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
57.72%
Acquisition spending well above PINS's 23.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
34.85%
Some yoy expansion while PINS is negative at -27.38%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-14.37%
We reduce yoy sales while PINS is 27.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-170.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -23.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
33.80%
We have mild expansions while PINS is negative at -23.28%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-12.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.46%
We cut yoy buybacks while PINS is 83.93%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.