PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.38%
Some net income increase while PINS is negative at -112.33%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
118.36%
Some D&A expansion while PINS is negative at -8.70%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
125.09%
Some yoy growth while PINS is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-6.98%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PINS at -0.46%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
76.02%
Less working capital growth vs. PINS's 317.49%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
148.59%
AR growth well above PINS's 243.62%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while PINS is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-597.42%
Both negative yoy AP, with PINS at -37.73%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
65.06%
Some yoy usage while PINS is negative at -75.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
225.76%
Some yoy increase while PINS is negative at -342.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
52.51%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x PINS's 37.89%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-9.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -182.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-110.34%
Negative yoy acquisition while PINS stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
25.26%
Some yoy expansion while PINS is negative at -38.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-26.10%
We reduce yoy sales while PINS is 28.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
253.03%
We have some outflow growth while PINS is negative at -65.41%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-38.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -114.36%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
43.13%
Debt repayment growth of 43.13% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.06%
We have some buyback growth while PINS is negative at -9.46%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.