PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
30.16%
Some net income increase while PINS is negative at -99.52%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.71%
Some D&A expansion while PINS is negative at -92.74%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
20.44%
Deferred tax of 20.44% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-5.06%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PINS at -5.77%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-28.18%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PINS is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
135.84%
AR growth well above PINS's 185.14%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-319.45%
Negative yoy AP while PINS is 313.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-79.68%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PINS at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1160.29%
Negative yoy while PINS is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-7.58%
Negative yoy CFO while PINS is 43.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-20.46%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -92.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-273.63%
Negative yoy acquisition while PINS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
17.21%
Some yoy expansion while PINS is negative at -32.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-5.48%
We reduce yoy sales while PINS is 24.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
189.82%
Growth of 189.82% while PINS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-0.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with PINS at -62.41%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-100.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PINS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.11%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of PINS's 5.37%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.