PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.37%
Some net income increase while SNAP is negative at -36.80%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.70%
Less D&A growth vs. SNAP's 42.97%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
35.92%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SNAP's 89.74%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-0.75%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SNAP at -54.26%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-64.81%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SNAP is 85.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-708.16%
AR is negative yoy while SNAP is 26.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
93.04%
Inventory growth of 93.04% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-127.89%
Negative yoy AP while SNAP is 154.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
125.20%
Growth well above SNAP's 136.67%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
300.00%
Well above SNAP's 152.52%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-4.39%
Negative yoy CFO while SNAP is 22.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-20.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -18.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-162.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -109.24%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
45.81%
Purchases well above SNAP's 47.05%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-24.98%
We reduce yoy sales while SNAP is 49.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.75%
We have some outflow growth while SNAP is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
63.96%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SNAP's 175.89%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
95.26%
Debt repayment growth of 95.26% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.