PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1.74%
Some net income increase while SNAP is negative at -1199.74%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-10.91%
Negative yoy D&A while SNAP is 17.09%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
490.45%
Some yoy growth while SNAP is negative at -106.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
8.83%
Less SBC growth vs. SNAP's 29338.76%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-113.72%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SNAP is 411.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
155.59%
AR growth well above SNAP's 133.66%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-213.11%
Negative yoy inventory while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
180.47%
AP growth well above SNAP's 16.34%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-46.14%
Negative yoy usage while SNAP is 53.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-40.63%
Negative yoy while SNAP is 51.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
1.43%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SNAP's 7.59%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
18.52%
CapEx growth well above SNAP's 11.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
84.74%
Acquisition spending well above SNAP's 49.83%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-48.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -584.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
51.63%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x SNAP's 15.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
5550.00%
Growth of 5550.00% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
39.37%
We have mild expansions while SNAP is negative at -948.23%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-38.46%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-130.52%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.