PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-144.86%
Negative net income growth while SNAP stands at 21.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
15.05%
D&A growth well above SNAP's 7.55%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
105.41%
Well above SNAP's 75.51% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
1.48%
SBC growth while SNAP is negative at -18.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
3361.19%
Slight usage while SNAP is negative at -861.15%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-165.13%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -389.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
11304.55%
Inventory growth of 11304.55% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
1203.28%
AP growth well above SNAP's 974.43%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
875.50%
Some yoy usage while SNAP is negative at -41.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-48.94%
Both negative yoy, with SNAP at -113.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
4.01%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SNAP's 9.24%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-21.74%
Negative yoy CapEx while SNAP is 18.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
89.23%
Acquisition spending well above SNAP's 73.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
63.38%
Purchases well above SNAP's 32.52%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-58.91%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SNAP at -26.92%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-33.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while SNAP is 195.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
51.58%
Investing outflow well above SNAP's 31.93%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
40.32%
Debt repayment growth of 40.32% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.