PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
411.29%
Some net income increase while SNAP is negative at -10.23%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.97%
Negative yoy D&A while SNAP is 14.73%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-212.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 107.63%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
33.03%
SBC growth while SNAP is negative at -26.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-88.58%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SNAP is 110.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
155.76%
AR growth well above SNAP's 160.99%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-167.71%
Negative yoy inventory while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-81.87%
Both negative yoy AP, with SNAP at -181.30%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-90.13%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -167.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-4612.50%
Both negative yoy, with SNAP at -28.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
13.38%
Some CFO growth while SNAP is negative at -31.75%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-69.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -71.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-8828.57%
Negative yoy acquisition while SNAP stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
36.10%
Some yoy expansion while SNAP is negative at -5.49%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-15.74%
We reduce yoy sales while SNAP is 15.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
66.67%
We have some outflow growth while SNAP is negative at -120.69%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-12.50%
We reduce yoy invests while SNAP stands at 48.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-109.16%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.43%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 97.95%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.