PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1.80%
Some net income increase while SNAP is negative at -6.54%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
8.94%
Some D&A expansion while SNAP is negative at -1.32%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-437.71%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
5.99%
SBC growth well above SNAP's 8.21%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
178.67%
Slight usage while SNAP is negative at -62.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-103.07%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -83.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
130.26%
Inventory growth of 130.26% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
117.49%
A yoy AP increase while SNAP is negative at -60.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
529.81%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SNAP's 1566.96%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-233.76%
Both negative yoy, with SNAP at -17.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
22.20%
Some CFO growth while SNAP is negative at -1159.27%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
10.22%
Some CapEx rise while SNAP is negative at -44.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
13.16%
Acquisition growth of 13.16% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
28.45%
Some yoy expansion while SNAP is negative at -58.49%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-42.30%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SNAP at -50.90%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-71.12%
We reduce yoy other investing while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-357.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -232.44%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
98.20%
Debt repayment growth of 98.20% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.35%
Buyback growth of 19.35% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.