PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.75%
Some net income increase while SNAP is negative at -153.66%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-26.09%
Negative yoy D&A while SNAP is 3.01%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-34.13%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
16.20%
SBC growth well above SNAP's 7.82%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-172.44%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SNAP is 194.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
151.31%
AR growth well above SNAP's 160.85%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-175.75%
Negative yoy inventory while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-201.97%
Negative yoy AP while SNAP is 533.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-2.64%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -151.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-74.43%
Both negative yoy, with SNAP at -270.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-14.94%
Negative yoy CFO while SNAP is 360.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-8.45%
Negative yoy CapEx while SNAP is 34.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-350.27%
Negative yoy acquisition while SNAP stands at 5.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-0.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while SNAP stands at 45.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
10.36%
1.25-1.5x SNAP's 8.13%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
152.63%
We have some outflow growth while SNAP is negative at -101.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
26.07%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SNAP's 219.86%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-1543.86%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.17%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.