PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.22%
Net income growth under 50% of SNAP's 52.55%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
12.19%
D&A growth well above SNAP's 15.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-439.58%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
1.87%
Less SBC growth vs. SNAP's 17.26%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
422.16%
Well above SNAP's 61.23% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
34.20%
AR growth well above SNAP's 23.81%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-58.45%
Negative yoy inventory while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
283.08%
AP growth well above SNAP's 122.10%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
405.35%
Growth well above SNAP's 40.19%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
27.57%
Some yoy increase while SNAP is negative at -164.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
16.67%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SNAP's 170.78%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-24.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -35.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
15.91%
Some acquisitions while SNAP is negative at -23.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-40.90%
Negative yoy purchasing while SNAP stands at 23.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
46.81%
We have some liquidation growth while SNAP is negative at -47.27%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
1586.96%
We have some outflow growth while SNAP is negative at -1900.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-10.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -217.69%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
17.43%
Debt repayment well below SNAP's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.45%
Buyback growth of 1.45% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.