PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.38%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SNAP at -1694.78%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
9.97%
D&A growth well above SNAP's 9.28%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-229.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
13.91%
SBC growth while SNAP is negative at -7.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
140.31%
Well above SNAP's 183.86% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
175.00%
AR growth well above SNAP's 181.35%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-305.10%
Negative yoy AP while SNAP is 52.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
63.55%
Some yoy usage while SNAP is negative at -1067.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
163.28%
Well above SNAP's 236.36%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
0.69%
Some CFO growth while SNAP is negative at -31.30%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-53.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while SNAP is 13.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
55.06%
Acquisition spending well above SNAP's 99.41%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
28.44%
Some yoy expansion while SNAP is negative at -144.16%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-18.41%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SNAP at -34.99%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
255.00%
We have some outflow growth while SNAP is negative at -2396.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
17.84%
We have mild expansions while SNAP is negative at -509.40%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-157.97%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.28%
Buyback growth of 1.28% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.