PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.64%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SNAP at -17.36%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.09%
Less D&A growth vs. SNAP's 108.11%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-2.73%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
6.17%
Less SBC growth vs. SNAP's 15.74%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-570.12%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -227.55%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-145.12%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -164.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
150.61%
A yoy AP increase while SNAP is negative at -107.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-215.27%
Negative yoy usage while SNAP is 63.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-30.06%
Both negative yoy, with SNAP at -79.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-22.64%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SNAP at -197.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
30.23%
Some CapEx rise while SNAP is negative at -10.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-514.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -1323.86%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
23.99%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. SNAP's 57.23%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-13.71%
We reduce yoy sales while SNAP is 76.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-37.75%
We reduce yoy other investing while SNAP is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
53.74%
Investing outflow well above SNAP's 101.12%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
19.84%
Debt repayment well below SNAP's 99.80%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.