PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.06%
Negative net income growth while SNAP stands at 19.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.83%
Less D&A growth vs. SNAP's 33.62%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-0.21%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2.49%
Less SBC growth vs. SNAP's 31.38%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-63.69%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -209.88%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-4657.73%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -1146.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.47%
Both negative yoy AP, with SNAP at -248.70%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
586.39%
Growth well above SNAP's 24.24%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
50.42%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SNAP's 136.20%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
1.12%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SNAP's 123.95%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-4.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -24.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
98.51%
Some acquisitions while SNAP is negative at -80.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
28.10%
Purchases well above SNAP's 7.30%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-52.11%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SNAP at -24.35%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-71.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while SNAP is 100.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-647.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -286.14%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
44.71%
Debt repayment growth of 44.71% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -0.01%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.