PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.47%
Some net income increase while SNAP is negative at -13.94%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-24.16%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SNAP at -27.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
3.64%
Deferred tax of 3.64% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
3.61%
SBC growth while SNAP is negative at -30.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
375.09%
Well above SNAP's 238.38% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
196.51%
AR growth well above SNAP's 258.26%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3846.43%
Both negative yoy AP, with SNAP at -165.03%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-140.06%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SNAP at -215.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-79.82%
Both negative yoy, with SNAP at -186.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-0.44%
Negative yoy CFO while SNAP is 20.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
17.20%
Some CapEx rise while SNAP is negative at -1.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
50.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. SNAP's 100.00%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-18.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -14.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
33.51%
1.25-1.5x SNAP's 27.60%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
-156.31%
We reduce yoy other investing while SNAP is 14443.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
52.69%
Investing outflow well above SNAP's 104.82%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
20.26%
Debt repayment well below SNAP's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.52%
Buyback growth below 50% of SNAP's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.