PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.04%
Some net income increase while SNAP is negative at -14.80%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.62%
D&A growth well above SNAP's 12.69%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-30.26%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.27%
SBC growth well above SNAP's 0.96%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
113.84%
Slight usage while SNAP is negative at -129.10%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-166.19%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -135.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
201.27%
AP growth well above SNAP's 122.79%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
334.56%
Growth well above SNAP's 150.64%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
29.21%
Well above SNAP's 2.53%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
21.94%
Some CFO growth while SNAP is negative at -154.23%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-9.52%
Negative yoy CapEx while SNAP is 22.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-609.52%
Negative yoy acquisition while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-49.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while SNAP stands at 27.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
2.74%
We have some liquidation growth while SNAP is negative at -24.95%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-85.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -205.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-266.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -552.19%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
81.95%
Debt repayment growth of 81.95% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.83%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.