PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
7.19%
Net income growth above 1.5x SNAP's 2.40%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
11.86%
D&A growth well above SNAP's 3.83%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
24.47%
Deferred tax of 24.47% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-0.54%
Negative yoy SBC while SNAP is 12.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-27.90%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SNAP is 15.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
4.31%
AR growth while SNAP is negative at -24.46%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
1543.08%
Inventory growth of 1543.08% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-80.07%
Both negative yoy AP, with SNAP at -301.17%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-44.36%
Negative yoy usage while SNAP is 110.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
86.63%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SNAP's 198.41%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
6.94%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SNAP's 115.60%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-16.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -98.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
57.72%
Acquisition spending well above SNAP's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
34.85%
Purchases well above SNAP's 15.36%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-14.37%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SNAP at -16.99%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-170.69%
We reduce yoy other investing while SNAP is 87.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
33.80%
We have mild expansions while SNAP is negative at -19.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-12.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.46%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.