PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.89%
Net income growth under 50% of SNAP's 105.94%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.52%
D&A growth well above SNAP's 1.88%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-35.20%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SNAP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-0.62%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SNAP at -0.96%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
182.24%
Slight usage while SNAP is negative at -82.05%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-219.36%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SNAP at -222.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.03%
Negative yoy AP while SNAP is 169.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
353.04%
Growth well above SNAP's 175.32%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
255.75%
Some yoy increase while SNAP is negative at -307.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
27.41%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SNAP's 99.04%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-9.30%
Both yoy lines negative, with SNAP at -9.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
96.69%
Acquisition growth of 96.69% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-1.68%
Negative yoy purchasing while SNAP stands at 51.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-6.56%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SNAP at -54.10%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
93.23%
Growth of 93.23% while SNAP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
10.17%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SNAP's 33.22%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
209.46%
Debt repayment above 1.5x SNAP's 100.00%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.70%
We cut yoy buybacks while SNAP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.