238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.41%
Net income growth under 50% of TWLO's 12.02%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.37%
Negative yoy D&A while TWLO is 11.34%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
72.36%
Deferred tax of 72.36% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
2.66%
SBC growth while TWLO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
573.31%
Well above TWLO's 108.92% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
207.09%
AR growth while TWLO is negative at -236.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
653.54%
Inventory growth of 653.54% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-1215.75%
Both negative yoy AP, with TWLO at -509.73%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-62.17%
Negative yoy usage while TWLO is 160.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
59.29%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. TWLO's 304.28%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
23.71%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of TWLO's 45.04%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
35.27%
Some CapEx rise while TWLO is negative at -1068.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
113.12%
Acquisition growth of 113.12% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-38.70%
Negative yoy purchasing while TWLO stands at 8.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
8.88%
Below 50% of TWLO's 194.36%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.60%
We reduce yoy invests while TWLO stands at 2200.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.