238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-29.30%
Negative net income growth while TWLO stands at 12.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.25%
Less D&A growth vs. TWLO's 11.34%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
2164.29%
Deferred tax of 2164.29% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
9.09%
SBC growth while TWLO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-13.04%
Negative yoy working capital usage while TWLO is 108.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
126.89%
AR growth while TWLO is negative at -236.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-100.19%
Negative yoy inventory while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
164.29%
A yoy AP increase while TWLO is negative at -509.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-93.07%
Negative yoy usage while TWLO is 160.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
121.43%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. TWLO's 304.28%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-10.04%
Negative yoy CFO while TWLO is 45.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
65.03%
Some CapEx rise while TWLO is negative at -1068.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
28.85%
Acquisition growth of 28.85% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-19.70%
Negative yoy purchasing while TWLO stands at 8.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-32.24%
We reduce yoy sales while TWLO is 194.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
38.80%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. TWLO's 100.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-55.18%
We reduce yoy invests while TWLO stands at 2200.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-79.04%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TWLO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with TWLO at -56.03%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.