238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
32.63%
Net income growth above 1.5x TWLO's 12.02%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
15.10%
D&A growth well above TWLO's 11.34%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-72.02%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TWLO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-6.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with TWLO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
11.57%
Less working capital growth vs. TWLO's 108.92%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-82.08%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TWLO at -236.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
527.78%
Inventory growth of 527.78% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-15.98%
Both negative yoy AP, with TWLO at -509.73%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
26.01%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. TWLO's 160.49%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-203.85%
Negative yoy while TWLO is 304.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
16.61%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of TWLO's 45.04%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-16.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with TWLO at -1068.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
81.52%
Acquisition growth of 81.52% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-10.67%
Negative yoy purchasing while TWLO stands at 8.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-24.68%
We reduce yoy sales while TWLO is 194.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
94.35%
Growth well above TWLO's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-66.74%
We reduce yoy invests while TWLO stands at 2200.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-6.35%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TWLO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.