PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.54%
Negative net income growth while TWLO stands at 21.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.35%
Negative yoy D&A while TWLO is 12.06%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
6.98%
Deferred tax of 6.98% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
4.04%
SBC growth while TWLO is negative at -1.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
90.94%
Less working capital growth vs. TWLO's 827.86%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
146.53%
AR growth while TWLO is negative at -10.11%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-252.34%
Negative yoy inventory while TWLO is 82.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-172.51%
Negative yoy AP while TWLO is 1747.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
124.62%
Growth well above TWLO's 21.73%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
111.04%
Some yoy increase while TWLO is negative at -5.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
19.38%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of TWLO's 236.80%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-15.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with TWLO at -16.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-525.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while TWLO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-13.26%
Negative yoy purchasing while TWLO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
9.34%
Liquidation growth of 9.34% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
69.33%
We have some outflow growth while TWLO is negative at -201.17%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-13.81%
Both yoy lines negative, with TWLO at -269.07%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.82%
Debt repayment growth of 99.82% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.87%
We cut yoy buybacks while TWLO is 88.89%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.