238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
35.39%
Some net income increase while TWLO is negative at -53.40%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
7.10%
Less D&A growth vs. TWLO's 20.72%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
1127.94%
Some yoy growth while TWLO is negative at -4285.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
0.88%
Less SBC growth vs. TWLO's 37.70%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
125.13%
Well above TWLO's 66.67% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-51.21%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TWLO at -117.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
40.55%
Some inventory rise while TWLO is negative at -154.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
129.29%
A yoy AP increase while TWLO is negative at -14.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
348.82%
Growth well above TWLO's 115.28%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-58.65%
Negative yoy while TWLO is 121.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
33.37%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of TWLO's 287.84%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-1.35%
Negative yoy CapEx while TWLO is 7.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-2746.15%
Both yoy lines negative, with TWLO at -542203.28%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
10.68%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. TWLO's 83.22%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
11.18%
1.25-1.5x TWLO's 7.57%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
85.96%
Growth well above TWLO's 114.81%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
52.09%
Investing outflow well above TWLO's 70.63%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
6.56%
We repay more while TWLO is negative at -43.27%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.09%
We cut yoy buybacks while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.