PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.18%
Negative net income growth while TWLO stands at 42.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
8.64%
Some D&A expansion while TWLO is negative at -2.35%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-853.46%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TWLO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
11.42%
SBC growth while TWLO is negative at -6.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-113.97%
Negative yoy working capital usage while TWLO is 69.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-196.53%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TWLO at -129.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
173.49%
AP growth well above TWLO's 43.69%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-7.64%
Negative yoy usage while TWLO is 710.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
73.46%
Some yoy increase while TWLO is negative at -4.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-7.65%
Negative yoy CFO while TWLO is 12.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-9.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with TWLO at -22.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
57.38%
Acquisition growth of 57.38% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-6.53%
Negative yoy purchasing while TWLO stands at 64.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
33.94%
At 50-75% of TWLO's 49.61%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
-231.68%
We reduce yoy other investing while TWLO is 6226.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
67.53%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. TWLO's 313.46%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
57.16%
Debt repayment similar to TWLO's 53.89%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.08%
We have some buyback growth while TWLO is negative at -156.88%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.