238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.89%
Net income growth under 50% of TWLO's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.52%
Some D&A expansion while TWLO is negative at -0.23%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-35.20%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TWLO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-0.62%
Both cut yoy SBC, with TWLO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
182.24%
Well above TWLO's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-219.36%
AR is negative yoy while TWLO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.03%
Both negative yoy AP, with TWLO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
353.04%
Some yoy usage while TWLO is negative at -175.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
255.75%
Well above TWLO's 16.99%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
27.41%
Some CFO growth while TWLO is negative at -46.93%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-9.30%
Negative yoy CapEx while TWLO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
96.69%
Acquisition growth of 96.69% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-1.68%
Negative yoy purchasing while TWLO stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-6.56%
Both yoy lines are negative, with TWLO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
93.23%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. TWLO's 995.02%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
10.17%
We have mild expansions while TWLO is negative at -51.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
209.46%
Debt repayment above 1.5x TWLO's 25.35%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.70%
We cut yoy buybacks while TWLO is 34.42%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.