PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.37%
Negative net income growth while TWLO stands at 12.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
11.39%
D&A growth well above TWLO's 11.34%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
61.46%
Deferred tax of 61.46% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
8.74%
SBC growth while TWLO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-200.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while TWLO is 108.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-273.32%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TWLO at -236.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
162.84%
A yoy AP increase while TWLO is negative at -509.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while TWLO is 160.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
7.55%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. TWLO's 304.28%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-23.24%
Negative yoy CFO while TWLO is 45.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-30.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with TWLO at -1068.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
96.18%
Acquisition growth of 96.18% while TWLO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-17.31%
Negative yoy purchasing while TWLO stands at 8.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
2.89%
Below 50% of TWLO's 194.36%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-442.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while TWLO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-51.56%
We reduce yoy invests while TWLO stands at 2200.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
We have some buyback growth while TWLO is negative at -56.03%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.