238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.37%
Negative net income growth while Communication Services median is 21.63%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
11.39%
D&A expands slightly while Communication Services is negative at -0.98%. Peter Lynch might see peers pausing expansions more aggressively.
61.46%
Deferred tax growth of 61.46% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
8.74%
SBC growth of 8.74% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-200.00%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-273.32%
AR shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
162.84%
AP growth of 162.84% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-100.00%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
7.55%
A moderate rise while Communication Services median is negative at -27.16%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
-23.24%
Negative CFO growth while Communication Services median is 17.20%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-30.52%
CapEx declines yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
96.18%
Acquisition growth of 96.18% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-17.31%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
2.89%
Proceeds growth of 2.89% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-442.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-51.56%
Reduced investing yoy while Communication Services median is 3.41%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
Buyback growth of 200.00% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.