PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-144.86%
Negative net income growth while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
15.05%
D&A growth of 15.05% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
105.41%
Deferred tax growth of 105.41% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
1.48%
SBC growth of 1.48% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
3361.19%
Working capital of 3361.19% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-165.13%
AR shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
11304.55%
Inventory growth of 11304.55% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
1203.28%
AP growth of 1203.28% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
875.50%
Growth of 875.50% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-48.94%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
4.01%
CFO growth of 4.01% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-21.74%
CapEx declines yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
89.23%
Acquisition growth of 89.23% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
63.38%
Purchases growth of 63.38% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-58.91%
We liquidate less yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-33.33%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
51.58%
Investing flow of 51.58% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
40.32%
Debt repayment growth of 40.32% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.