PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
30.16%
Positive net income growth while Communication Services median is negative at -0.68%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
6.71%
D&A expands slightly while Communication Services is negative at -0.48%. Peter Lynch might see peers pausing expansions more aggressively.
20.44%
Deferred tax growth of 20.44% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-5.06%
SBC declines yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-28.18%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Communication Services median is -28.18%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
135.84%
AR growth of 135.84% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-319.45%
AP shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-79.68%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Communication Services median is -69.16%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-1160.29%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Communication Services median is -40.76%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-7.58%
Negative CFO growth while Communication Services median is -16.30%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-20.46%
CapEx declines yoy while Communication Services median is 3.63%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-273.63%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
17.21%
Purchases growth of 17.21% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-5.48%
We liquidate less yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
189.82%
Growth of 189.82% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-0.09%
Reduced investing yoy while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-100.00%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.11%
Buyback growth of 3.11% while Communication Services median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.