PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.41%
Net income growth 0-5% – Slight. Howard Marks would worry about possible stagnation in bottom-line profitability.
-1.37%
Negative yoy D&A growth lowers the drag on net earnings. Benjamin Graham would confirm if it is due to fully depreciated assets or a slower expansion cycle.
72.36%
Deferred taxes above 30% yoy – Significant surge. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on what drives this big potential future tax burden.
2.66%
SBC up to 10% yoy – Acceptable. Seth Klarman would expect net income to grow enough to offset the mild dilution.
573.31%
Working capital above 30% yoy – Very high. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether the buildup is strategic or signals inefficiency.
207.09%
Receivables above 15% yoy – Alarm for possible major collection issues. Philip Fisher would investigate if revenue recognition is artificially boosted.
653.54%
Inventory above 15% yoy – Large spike. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether sales growth can absorb the extra stock.
-1215.75%
A negative yoy AP change means the firm is paying down supplier credit. Benjamin Graham would see it as lowering short-term liabilities if revenue is stable.
-62.17%
A negative yoy shift in other WC might free up cash flow. Benjamin Graham would confirm the items are not essential to operations or revenue generation.
59.29%
Above 30% yoy – Major jump. Philip Fisher would investigate whether this is a recurring or truly one-time distortion.
23.71%
Operating cash flow growth above 20% – Exceptional. Warren Buffett would ensure it stems from sustainable operations, not just working capital shifts.
35.27%
CapEx above 15% yoy – Significant. Philip Fisher would demand strong evidence of high-ROI projects to offset the spending.
113.12%
Acquisition spending above 15% yoy – Aggressive M&A approach. Philip Fisher would demand evidence the acquisitions truly enhance shareholder value.
-38.70%
A negative yoy shift can boost short-term liquidity if no prime investments appear. Benjamin Graham would consider it wise if safer returns do not exist.
8.88%
Proceeds growth 5-10% yoy – Mild. Peter Lynch would consider the rationale behind these partial liquidations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.60%
A negative yoy shift suggests smaller outflows or net inflows if disposals exceed invests. Benjamin Graham would see a short-term FCF benefit unless growth is compromised.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.