PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.86%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
6.53%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-18.24%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
2.17%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-18.37%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-17.96%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-17.79%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.50%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.76%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
5.00%
Dividend growth of 5.00% while BIDU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-23.24%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-72.03%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
513.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 103.99%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
183.22%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 27.04%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
50.32%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 12.78%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
347.75%
OCF/share CAGR of 347.75% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
123.05%
OCF/share CAGR of 123.05% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
55.19%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 55.19% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
708.47%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 106.66% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
355.76%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 106.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
91.41%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of BIDU's 105.76%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
265.94%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 372.68%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
96.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 69.04%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
54.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 29.48%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.94%
AR growth well above BIDU's 4.27%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.61%
Positive asset growth while BIDU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.64%
1.25-1.5x BIDU's 3.87%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
50.90%
We have some new debt while BIDU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.86%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 12.65%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
26.76%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 0.79%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.