PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.95%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
16.74%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
28.36%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
28.36%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
35.00%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
36.84%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
36.84%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.74%
Share change of 1.74% while BIDU is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.74%
Diluted share change of 1.74% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.85%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-60.27%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
144.85%
10Y CAGR of 144.85% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
144.85%
5Y CAGR of 144.85% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
144.85%
3Y CAGR of 144.85% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.06%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-46.06%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-46.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.39%
R&D growth of 10.39% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
12.99%
SG&A growth of 12.99% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.