PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.01%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 27.61%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
17.43%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of BIDU's 21.75%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
11.24%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
11.24%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
11.19%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
9.43%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
10.74%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.63%
Slight or no buybacks while BIDU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.85%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x BIDU's 7.82%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.54%
OCF growth of 3.54% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-24.18%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
920.42%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 314.84%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
920.42%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 314.84%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
920.42%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 314.84%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
976.04%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 281.30% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
976.04%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 281.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
976.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 281.30%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.12%
AR growth well above BIDU's 2.02%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
110.13%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 238.58%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
118.83%
Under 50% of BIDU's 4124.29%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-96.56%
We’re deleveraging while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
58.42%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 27.34%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
12.88%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 7.97%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.