238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.51%
Revenue growth under 50% of BIDU's 25.13%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
11.86%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 26.87%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
14.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of BIDU's 31.71%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
14.22%
Operating income growth under 50% of BIDU's 31.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
1.70%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 46.09%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
1.17%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 38.89%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.20%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 47.06%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.56%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.62%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.36%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.09%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.48%
OCF growth of 19.48% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
1593.20%
FCF growth of 1593.20% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
1476.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 701.74%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
1476.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 701.74%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
480.51%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 701.74%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
547.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 547.00% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
1777.31%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 1405.46%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
1777.31%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 1405.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
3018.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 1405.46%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.49%
AR growth well above BIDU's 24.74%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.01%
Asset growth at 75-90% of BIDU's 11.08%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
7.18%
75-90% of BIDU's 8.86%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.65%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 34.52%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
7.57%
SG&A declining or stable vs. BIDU's 19.73%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.