PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.68%
Revenue growth under 50% of BIDU's 45.61%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
5.39%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 46.52%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-9.55%
Negative EBIT growth while BIDU is at 74.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-9.55%
Negative operating income growth while BIDU is at 74.68%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-7.69%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 65.97%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-8.02%
Negative EPS growth while BIDU is at 68.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-7.80%
Negative diluted EPS growth while BIDU is at 64.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.36%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.37%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.19%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.85%
OCF growth of 0.85% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
5.16%
FCF growth of 5.16% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
3381.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 1088.23%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
3381.31%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 1088.23%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
386.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 344.33%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
563.93%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 563.93% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
3765.32%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 2020.66% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
3765.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 2020.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
929.57%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of BIDU's 1435.36%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1600.93%
Equity/share CAGR of 1600.93% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.62%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 65.70%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
52.30%
Inventory growth well above BIDU's 8.21%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
7.04%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 15.66%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
6.59%
50-75% of BIDU's 9.77%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.30%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 27.25%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
19.69%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 25.14%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.