PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.28%
Revenue growth under 50% of BIDU's 23.76%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
11.12%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 24.13%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
19.30%
EBIT growth 50-75% of BIDU's 30.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
19.30%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 30.35%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
15.66%
Net income growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 28.09%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
15.44%
EPS growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 26.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
15.28%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 26.83%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.25%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.31%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.35%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.15%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.74%
OCF growth of 32.74% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
64.93%
FCF growth of 64.93% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
2318.22%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 1533.69%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
2318.22%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 1533.69%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
360.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 448.19%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
501.21%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 501.21% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
2570.21%
Similar net income/share CAGR to BIDU's 2833.03%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
2570.21%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 2833.03%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
1706.56%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 1860.47%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
613.14%
Equity/share CAGR of 613.14% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.51%
AR growth well above BIDU's 10.59%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
12.67%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. BIDU's 66.37%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
8.95%
Asset growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 11.94%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
6.74%
50-75% of BIDU's 11.57%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.12%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 17.85%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
4.03%
SG&A declining or stable vs. BIDU's 17.72%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.