PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.07%
Revenue growth similar to BIDU's 15.55%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
11.76%
Gross profit growth similar to BIDU's 12.95%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
9.33%
EBIT growth above 1.5x BIDU's 5.38%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
9.33%
Operating income growth above 1.5x BIDU's 5.38%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
12.75%
Net income growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 21.50%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
120.93%
EPS growth above 1.5x BIDU's 22.64%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
124.85%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x BIDU's 25.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.13%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.12%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.71%
OCF growth of 3.71% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-6.02%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1849.46%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to BIDU's 1811.05%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
1849.46%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 1811.05%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
311.24%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 530.16%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
304.27%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 304.27% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
1935.73%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 3451.99%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
1935.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 3451.99%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
419.49%
Below 50% of BIDU's 2282.86%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
580.79%
Below 50% of BIDU's 19670.62%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.24%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 103.19%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
8.55%
Asset growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 13.77%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
8.00%
50-75% of BIDU's 14.72%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.96%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 24.90%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
13.83%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 20.44%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.