PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.45%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.13%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
7.32%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
7.32%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
8.34%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-47.37%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-47.37%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.75%
Share reduction more than 1.5x BIDU's 1.83%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.37%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x BIDU's 2.30%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.09%
OCF growth of 5.09% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-7.60%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
8595.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 1588.92%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
1552.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 1588.92%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
250.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 323.43%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1149.71%
OCF/share CAGR of 1149.71% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
185.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 185.53% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
11405.35%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 2070.26% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
3889.64%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 2070.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
200.87%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1874.56%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
503.55%
Below 50% of BIDU's 13626.59%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.97%
Our AR growth while BIDU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.96%
Asset growth above 1.5x BIDU's 3.75%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
6.47%
1.25-1.5x BIDU's 5.68%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.70%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 10.05%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
7.11%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 10.77%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.