PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.49%
Revenue growth under 50% of BIDU's 39.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
4.69%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 50.86%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
2.05%
EBIT growth below 50% of BIDU's 87.54%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
2.05%
Operating income growth under 50% of BIDU's 87.54%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-4.57%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 80.87%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-0.70%
Negative EPS growth while BIDU is at 79.07%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-2.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while BIDU is at 80.95%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.22%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.20%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.06%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.75%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
13.95%
FCF growth of 13.95% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
4673.69%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 2255.92%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
1789.24%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 2255.92%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
234.44%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 868.91%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2922.92%
OCF/share CAGR of 2922.92% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
143.93%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 143.93% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
5055.68%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 3657.04%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
4147.72%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 3657.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
213.91%
Below 50% of BIDU's 1750.80%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
465.40%
Below 50% of BIDU's 7381.18%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.16%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 25.85%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
31.62%
We show growth while BIDU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.70%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 14.52%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
6.24%
Under 50% of BIDU's 12.61%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.36%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 38.29%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
12.06%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 18.50%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.