PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.25%
Revenue growth under 50% of BIDU's 14.52%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
4.61%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 16.90%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
4.41%
EBIT growth below 50% of BIDU's 33.28%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
4.41%
Operating income growth under 50% of BIDU's 33.28%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
3.41%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 31.27%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
0.70%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 35.06%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
2.04%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 36.84%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.14%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.12%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.08%
Reduced diluted shares while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.71%
OCF growth of 23.71% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
62.21%
FCF growth of 62.21% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
3036.47%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to BIDU's 2903.03%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
1054.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 2903.03%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
207.37%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 623.90%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1259.02%
OCF/share CAGR of 1259.02% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
195.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 195.79% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
3088.17%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 5297.52%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
5195.36%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 5297.52%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
196.29%
Below 50% of BIDU's 2766.74%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
173.57%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 103.02%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.80%
Firm’s AR is declining while BIDU shows 21.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
18.01%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. BIDU's 5606597100.00%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
5.58%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 12.68%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.88%
Under 50% of BIDU's 14.64%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.28%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 10.07%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
5.88%
We expand SG&A while BIDU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.