PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.88%
Positive revenue growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
4.24%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
12.91%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
12.91%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-70.35%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-39.10%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-39.80%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.09%
Share reduction while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.08%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.87%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
1.21%
FCF growth of 1.21% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
2179.42%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
830.96%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
161.00%
Positive 3Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1963.31%
OCF/share CAGR of 1963.31% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
183.19%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 183.19% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
538.84%
Positive 10Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1084.29%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-9.72%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3815.49%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 3062.39%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
163.41%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 115.39%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.96%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 13.91%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
156.82%
We show growth while BIDU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.12%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 10.75%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.87%
Under 50% of BIDU's 9.66%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
We increase R&D while BIDU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-9.70%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.