PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.25%
Revenue growth under 50% of BIDU's 35.37%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.22%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 43.07%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.53%
Negative EBIT growth while BIDU is at 113.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.53%
Negative operating income growth while BIDU is at 113.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
4.36%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 111.61%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
9.09%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 115.38%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.09%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 115.38%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.21%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.13%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.41%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.16%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.47%
Negative OCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-26.02%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
4779.75%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 3089.95%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
582.01%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 1092.86%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
114.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 451.43%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
753.63%
OCF/share CAGR of 753.63% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
82.83%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 82.83% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
5997.27%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x BIDU's 5191.98%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
1524.07%
Below 50% of BIDU's 3970.49%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
96.69%
Below 50% of BIDU's 531.11%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2586.26%
Equity/share CAGR of 2586.26% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
125.91%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 221.75%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.98%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 75.84%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
32.44%
Inventory growth of 32.44% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
4.91%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 16.77%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.63%
Under 50% of BIDU's 17.50%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.28%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. BIDU's 11.89%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-5.54%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.