238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.64%
Revenue growth under 50% of BIDU's 16.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
8.89%
Gross profit growth under 50% of BIDU's 19.60%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
10.67%
EBIT growth below 50% of BIDU's 23.33%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
10.67%
Operating income growth under 50% of BIDU's 23.33%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
10.37%
Net income growth under 50% of BIDU's 28.60%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
8.33%
EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 28.57%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of BIDU's 28.57%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.19%
Share count expansion well above BIDU's 0.20%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.38%
Diluted share count expanding well above BIDU's 0.18%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.40%
OCF growth of 69.40% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
72.80%
FCF growth of 72.80% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
3240.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of BIDU's 4033.85%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
536.65%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 1287.13%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
111.88%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of BIDU's 415.61%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
887.09%
OCF/share CAGR of 887.09% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
160.19%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 160.19% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
3922.02%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 7383.02%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
2621.14%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 5124.29%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
114.24%
Below 50% of BIDU's 457.89%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1024.11%
Equity/share CAGR of 1024.11% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
124.53%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of BIDU's 236.73%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.12%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 22.31%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
15.19%
Inventory growth of 15.19% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
7.24%
Asset growth well under 50% of BIDU's 17.52%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
6.53%
Under 50% of BIDU's 13.93%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.05%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 21.74%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
6.47%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 9.72%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.