PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.26%
Positive revenue growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
14.70%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
19.62%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
19.62%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
20.45%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.08%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
15.38%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.23%
Slight or no buybacks while BIDU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.76%
Slight or no buyback while BIDU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.20%
OCF growth of 0.20% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-1.16%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
2540.86%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
457.09%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
97.81%
Positive 3Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
538.94%
OCF/share CAGR of 538.94% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
184.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 184.94% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
3163.51%
Positive 10Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
732.81%
Positive 5Y CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
81.97%
Positive short-term CAGR while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
958.39%
Below 50% of BIDU's 44778.67%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
100.75%
Below 50% of BIDU's 239.59%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.16%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. BIDU's 34.92%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-2.87%
Inventory is declining while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
7.41%
Asset growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 12.20%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
6.52%
50-75% of BIDU's 10.76%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.81%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
18.13%
We expand SG&A while BIDU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.