PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.84%
Revenue growth above 1.5x BIDU's 0.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
16.05%
Positive gross profit growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
17.08%
Positive EBIT growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
17.08%
Positive operating income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
17.35%
Positive net income growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
17.65%
Positive EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
17.65%
Positive diluted EPS growth while BIDU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.42%
Slight or no buybacks while BIDU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.98%
Slight or no buyback while BIDU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.18%
OCF growth of 22.18% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-53.92%
Negative FCF growth while BIDU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
3211.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 103.99%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
279.17%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 27.04%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
69.87%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 12.78%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
361.70%
OCF/share CAGR of 361.70% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
102.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 102.29% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
4068.40%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 106.66% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
489.04%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 106.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
104.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to BIDU's 105.76%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
323.26%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 69.04%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
97.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x BIDU's 29.48%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.00%
AR growth well above BIDU's 4.27%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
87.68%
Inventory growth of 87.68% while BIDU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
8.45%
Positive asset growth while BIDU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.37%
BV/share growth above 1.5x BIDU's 3.87%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
63.29%
We have some new debt while BIDU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
5.73%
R&D dropping or stable vs. BIDU's 12.65%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
22.46%
SG&A growth well above BIDU's 0.79%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.